社区黑料

Explore

Some Microschools in Limbo While Awaiting New Federal Tax Credit Rules

The confusion lies in whether states consider the small learning programs to be private schools.

Kipe Academy, a microschool in Winter Haven, Florida, is a tutoring center, not a private school under the state鈥檚 definition. (Courtesy of Tonya Kipe)

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 社区黑料 Newsletter

Public schools are beginning to imagine ways they can benefit from the new , after the Treasury Department clarified last month that district students will be eligible for scholarships.

But for microschools, a growing segment of the private school market, the initial guidance from federal officials has left school leaders worried they could be left out.

The law says that students can use scholarships for expenses at a public, private or religious school. But many microschools operate outside of their state鈥檚 private school sector 鈥 as tutoring centers, homeschool groups and learning pods. Depending on state law,聽they may or may not be classified as private schools.

In his , Kevin Salinger, the deputy assistant secretary for tax policy, added that 鈥渁 homeschool would be treated as a school if it is treated as a school under state law.鈥

His comments have left some microschool leaders scratching their heads.

Even if a state decides to opt in to the new program, 鈥渋t is my concern that some will exclude microschools,鈥 said Don Soifer, CEO of the National Microschooling Center, who is closely monitoring the issue.

To him, Congress鈥 intent was clear. The states that if a student is eligible to attend a public K-12 school, then they will qualify for a scholarship as long as their family鈥檚 income doesn鈥檛 exceed 300% of the area median income, a high bar. Florida, Ohio and Tennessee are among the states that plan to participate in the program but have microschools that don鈥檛 fall under the private school umbrella. Some who advocated for passage of the law say microschool leaders should stay tuned for more information.

鈥淲e think Treasury misspoke or is misinterpreting the statute,鈥 said Jim Blew, a former Department of Education official who is working to implement the new program. 鈥淚t’ll all be cleared up by the time they issue the rules for 2027.鈥

The Treasury Department did not respond to requests for comment.

鈥業n the hands of the states鈥 

Under the program, which starts next year, taxpayers who donate to a nonprofit scholarship granting organization will get a dollar-for-dollar credit, up to $1,700. Opponents, including Sen. Mark Kelly, an Arizona Democrat, want Congress to , and the teachers unions are to opt out. They note that Salinger, the Treasury official, said states won鈥檛 be able to 鈥渋mpose鈥 restrictions on SGOs. They can鈥檛, for example, only approve nonprofits that offer scholarships to public school kids and not approve those that serve students attending private schools.

Other Democrats, like former Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Jorge Elorza, CEO of Democrats for Education Reform, have urged blue state governors to opt in. that the program 鈥渙pens the door to new, private donations, at no cost to taxpayers, that can support students in public and nonpublic settings alike.鈥

Cecilia Retelle Zywicki, founder of LearningSpring, which is building a system for states to track SGOs and payments, expects the Trump administration to stay out of the debate over how states define a school.

鈥淒etails like this are going to remain in the hands of the states,鈥 she said. 鈥淭he Treasury has made it clear in actions and words that oversight and compliance will remain with the states.鈥

鈥楢 bummer鈥

That means even in red states that already intend to participate, some students could be left out. 

鈥淚t’s a bummer because I know it would help the families,鈥 said Tonya Kipe, who runs Kipe Academy in Winter Haven, Florida, as a nonprofit tutoring center out of a Methodist church. 

She鈥檚 among those microschool founders who prefer not to organize as a private school. In addition to the microschool, which serves 36 students, she offers afterschool tutoring and a monthly science workshop. Becoming a more formal private school, she said, might require them to find a different facility and add testing requirements

As a former second grade teacher and mother of two boys, she knows how students can have vastly different learning needs. Her older son, she said, is the 鈥渃ompliant one,鈥 while her younger son wasn鈥檛 motivated by public school routines like earning points for reading books. She launched her own school in 2021 to break out of a 鈥渃ookie cutter鈥 approach to education. 

The families who signed up for her microschool were looking for the same thing.

鈥淭hey like the flexibility of being able to just be here for academics from 8 to 11:30 and then join us for field trips if they want to,鈥 she said. While many in her program already use Florida鈥檚 various private school choice options, she said the federal program could allow them to 鈥渄ouble up鈥 on tutoring, buy more supplies or add other supplemental programs.

Large microschool networks, like KaiPod Learning, are preparing for a patchwork approach across the country.

With locations in 21 states, KaiPod has 91 affiliated schools, about half of them private schools. The others operate as less-formal learning pods or co-ops, said CEO Amar Kumar. 

Kaipod will add about 40 more schools next school year, a third of them in Texas, where the state鈥檚 new Education Freedom Accounts program launches this fall. With that growth, he thinks the percentage of private schools in the network will likely climb to 65%.

Microschools, he said, are moving toward 鈥渕ore formalized structures鈥 as public funding for private school choice expands. 

鈥淥ur view is that this is healthy for the microschool movement,鈥 he said. 鈥淔amilies want flexibility and personalization, but they also want confidence that the school is stable, accountable and able to access available funding.鈥

With roughly 1,000 microschools , the Prenda network helped introduce the public to the model during the pandemic when sites began to pop up . While there are Prenda microschools in nearly every state, founder Kelly Smith said the organization has focused on expanding sites, like those in Texas, where they qualify as private schools and families can apply for public funds.

鈥淲ealthy families already participate in microschools by paying out of pocket,鈥 he said. But the federal program 鈥渉as the potential of allowing lower and middle class families to send their kids to microschools.鈥 

He said he was 鈥渂affled鈥 that some states were saying no to additional federal funds.

鈥淭hat is something governors almost never do,鈥 he said.

Did you use this article in your work?

We鈥檇 love to hear how 社区黑料鈥檚 reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.

Republish This Article

We want our stories to be shared as widely as possible 鈥 for free.

Please view 社区黑料's republishing terms.





On 社区黑料 Today